This months Beer52 box contained a rather exciting experiment which highlights the difference that a single ingredient can make.
Exactly the same reason for building Brewnode.
Ruby Rising v 11th Hour
Both beers have Caramalt, Amber Malt, and Pilsner Malt. 11th hour has the addition of rye malt. The differences were surprising. The rye dramatically increased the head foam and its retention. It also caused a slight haze. Overall it seemed more rounded and suited the style.
California Dreaming v Dreaming of Frites.
No surprises here. The Abbey yeast gave a saison nose and correspondingly typical flavour. It also made the beer a bit darker and slightly better head retention.
Zig v Zag
Zig used a Belgian abbey yeast and Zag was T-58 (whatever that means). In my mind, Zig was the clearly the better beer. It had a sweet, fruity aroma and a more rounded mouth feel than Zag. Most significantly, Zag retained no head foam and was clearly less effervescent.
Mosaic v Ekuanot
Well this one is all about the nose. I preferred the Mosaic because it was more floral and slightly sweet smelling.The Ekuanot was not as powerful and had a medicinal edge to it. Mosaic has a stronger aftertaste but was less bitter than Ekuanot.
One thing that came as a surprise was that the Ekuanot had better head retention. I don’t understand how hops can have this effect. I definitely need to do some more research on this.
Amber malt increased the head retention but introduced a slight haze.
I wanted to compare how my inspired brew compared to the original. Given the problems experienced during the brew it is no surprise that they are not the same.
First of all, the beers look different. My Little Dead Pony is significantly darker. The aroma also is noticeably different too. I am no expert but I would almost describe my brew as being “off”. Not in a particularly bad way but just a bit odd. Brewdog’s aroma is much more hop-like whereas mine is not that reminiscent of hops.
Taste-wise, things improve somewhat. Mine is very bitter – in a good way. A nice strong after-taste lingers. But if anything, it’s probably a little too bitter. Again I still prefer Brewdog’s because I can’t help feel that there’s something wrong with my brew.
I couldn’t wait for my bottles of nostalgic Punk IPA to arrive. Brewdog have released versions of their original recipe 10 years on. I’ve fond memories of this stuff and I know for sure that it’s changed over the years. Although I was curious to know if my memories were purely nostalgic or not.
So I poured each one into an identical glass and started the test.
The 2017 version as we all know is light, fresh and hoppy. It’s clean with a bitter after taste.
The 2007 version was noticeably bitter, which I liked. However I felt it was bordering on being ‘off’. There was a rather unpleasant fusty smell. This was also reflected in the taste. I am no brewing expert but either my taste buds have matured over he past 10 years or I got sent a dodgy batch.
Light and golden
Noticeably darker and slightly less carbonation than 2017
Floral and hoppy.
Not terribly pleasant. Borderline off and stale.
Clean and bitter.
Stale beginning but hop bitterness kicks in later.
Ahtanum, Chinook, Crystal, Motueka.
Ahtanum, Amarillo, Cascade, Chinook, Nelson Sauvin, Simcoe.
Overall I think a combination of the two would be ideal. I didn’t like the aroma of the original but I did appreciate the extra hoppiness.
Perhaps my own taste has moved on but I would not buy 2007 Punk IPA today. There are just too many similar beers available that are a lot better. It’s probably a good thing that Punk has changed to keep up with today’s tastes.